So I went to Michael's blog and saw he had taken a relationship quiz. I know I'm single, but what the hell - I've gota ridiculous amount of things on my plate and if I want to take a minute to take a quiz, I figure, why the heck not?

I got an interesting mix for an answer. So I took it again. I got a better answer, but I think I'm sort of between the two.

Here's the one I'm more like:
Expressive Practical Intellectual Giver. This makes you a Catch.

• You are a magazine-cover, matinee idol dreamboat.
• Parents love you and want to set you up with their kids.
• However, first dates are tough because it takes time for your qualities to come out.
• You are generous and kind.
• You think first and act later.
• You are cool in a conflict, but your practical side means if your partner throws out emotional appeals ("why can't we do what I want for a change?") they will grate on your nerves, even when the conflict is resolved.
• You're a romantic.
• You enjoy the thrill of the hunt, and you don't just fall into bed with anyone.
• You pay close attention to your significant other's needs, and this makes you an excellent lover and partner.
• The problem is that your friends and lovers may find it so easy to express things to *you* that they lose sight of whether you feel as comfortable with *them*! This doesn't necessarily make you feel under-appreciated -- you're too well-adjusted and self-aware for that -- but you may feel restless. Thus you seek adventure in your life outside the relationship to prove and actualize yourself.
• Of all the types, you would make the best parent.
• You are coiffed. Didja see "Big Fish"? 'Cause you're like Ewan MacGregor in "Big Fish."
• Of the 14743 people who have taken this quiz, 8.2 % are this type.

Interesting.

On the other hand, I took a "Which West Wing Character are you Most Like?" Quiz and came up with Jed Bartlett as my number one. Leave it to a dork like me to be wicked excited about that:

Your Top Three Matches Are:

1. Jed Bartlet. You ahve the capacity for brilliance, and you know it, too. Your faith in yourself can lead you far, but it also makes you stubborn as hell. Honor is everything to you, and compromise never sits easily.

2. Sam Seaborn. Self-effacing and sensitive to others' needs, you tend to internalize your own frustrations. You have incredible faith in the goodness of people, and colliding with harsh reality can be painful.

3. Leo McGarry. Rational and realistic, you keep tightly self-controlled. you have a sort fuse, but you balance it with a dry sense of fun. Unforgiving of your own weaknesses, you're loyal to a fault to others.

Yessiree, I'm procrastinating pretty hard core today. Otay. Back to work.

Okay. So I've been busy. And I have something to announce to everyone who reads this.

By the way, do many of you read this?

...

I guess I'll never really know.

So anyway, here's my big news:

I'm leaving New York City. Well, temporarily. So I think.

Lemme clarify.

I've accepted a job offer with AFSCME to assit in coordinating the western region of Washington State for the Presidential, Congressional, Gubernatorial, and State races. I'm leaving for Seattle in less than two weeks. AAAGGH!

So I've been awfully busy cleaning up all the stuff that needs to be taken care of here. We just moved apartments, I just got a new car - and I'm going to the left Coast. Sweet.

Technically, I should return to NYC after the election is over. What shall I do then, you ask? Just see where life takes me, whether it be grad school or another jobbie or going home for a little while - I'm excited about all of the prospects. I'm not ready to leave NYC yet, but it's the impetus for bigger and better things - and a little risk never hurt anyone before.

So I plan on being much much better at this blogging thing. Either that, or I'll be updating my website with pictures and adventures from the campaign trail. Seriously, I've never been to Seattle before and I'm ridiculously excited to get a chance to live there for just a little while. I've always thought I'd enjoy that town. So I'm about to find out.

Yes, I will be busy, but I'll have many adventures to share! So keep checking back here. If I get a spare moment between packing and all the other crap I have to do before I leave, I'll try to post one more time. But seriously, I plan on sharing much with anyone who will listen, so look out!

In the meantime, here is a great article I came across in the Washington Post the other day. Enjoy!

Do You Hear What I Hear?
The Washington Post
By Dana Milbank
Tuesday, August 24, 2004; Page A15

The 2004 presidential campaign sometimes resembles the children's game of "telephone." Here are some quotations as they came out of Democratic nominee John F. Kerry's mouth -- and how President Bush and Vice President Cheney later recounted them.

"Every performer tonight in their own way, either verbally or through their music, through their lyrics, have conveyed to you the heart and soul of our country." -- Kerry, July 8

"The other day, my opponent said he thought you could find the heart and soul of America in Hollywood." -- Bush, Aug. 18

"My goal, my diplomacy, my statesmanship is to get our troops reduced in number and I believe if you do the statesmanship properly, I believe if you do the kind of alliance building that is available to us, that it's appropriate to have a goal of reducing the troops over that period of time [the first six months of a Kerry administration]. Obviously, we'd have to see how events unfold. . . . It is an appropriate goal to have and I'm going to try to achieve it." -- Kerry, Aug. 9

"I took exception when my opponent said if he's elected, we'll substantially reduce the troops in six months. He shouldn't have said that. See, it sends a mixed signal to the enemy for starters. So the enemy hangs around for six months and one day. . . . It says, maybe America isn't going to keep its word." -- Bush, Aug. 18

"I will fight this war on terror with the lessons I learned in war. I defended this country as a young man, and I will defend it as president of the United States. I believe I can fight a more effective, more thoughtful, more strategic, more proactive, more sensitive war on terror that reaches out to other nations and brings them to our side and lives up to American values in history. I lay out a strategy to strengthen our military, to build and lead strong alliances and reform our intelligence system. I set out a path to win the peace in Iraq and to get the terrorists wherever they may be before they get us." -- Kerry, Aug. 5

"Senator Kerry has also said that if he were in charge he would fight a 'more sensitive' war on terror. America has been in too many wars for any of our wishes, but not a one of them was won by being sensitive. . . . Those who threaten us and kill innocents around the world do not need to be treated more sensitively. They need to be destroyed." -- Cheney, Aug. 12

"Lee Hamilton, the co-chairman of the 9/11 commission, has said this administration is not moving with the urgency necessary to respond to our needs. I believe this administration and its policies is actually encouraging the recruitment of terrorists. We haven't done the work necessary to reach out to other countries. We haven't done the work necessary with the Muslim world. We haven't done the work necessary to protect our own ports, our chemical facilities, our nuclear facilities. There is a long, long list in the 9/11 recommendations that are undone."
-- Kerry, Aug. 2

"My opponent says . . . that going to war with the terrorists is actually improving their recruiting efforts. I think the logic -- I know the logic is upside down. It shows a misunderstanding of the nature of these people. See, during the 1990s, these killers and terrorists were recruiting and training for war with us, long before we went to war with them. They don't need an excuse for their hatred. It's wrong to blame America for anger and the evil of these killers. We don't create terrorists by fighting back. You defeat the terrorists by fighting back." -- Bush, Aug. 18

"Yes, I would have voted for the authority [to use force in Iraq]. I believe it is the right authority for a president to have. But I would have used that authority, as I have said throughout this campaign, effectively. I would have done this very differently from the way President Bush has. My question to President Bush is: Why did he rush to war without a plan to win the peace? Why did he rush to war on faulty intelligence and not do the hard work necessary to give America the truth?" -- Kerry, Aug. 9

"He now agrees it was the right decision to go into Iraq. After months of questioning my motives, and even my credibility, the Massachusetts senator now agrees with me that even though we have not found the stockpiles of weapons we all believed were there, knowing everything we know today, he would have voted to go into Iraq and remove Saddam Hussein from power." -- Bush, Aug. 18

Now for an update on the White House's ongoing effort to kill the press corps. The White House travel office signed a contract last week with an airline called Primaris to fly the press corps to Bush events. The two-month-old company has only one airplane. True, media representatives gave their blessing to the deal. But that was before they learned that the company's president twice had his pilot's license revoked related to his flying of an "unairworthy" aircraft, that the chief executive flopped in his last attempt to start an airline and that the 15-year-old plane itself was damaged in a hailstorm a decade ago and spent most of the past two years mothballed in France.